There’s a part of this I haven’t seen anyone say out loud. When the person opening the PR gets credit for shipping and the reviewer bears the consequences of reviewing a bad merge, you have a structural problem no tool can solve. That incentive gap widens when the contributor isn’t an engineer building context over time. A PM using an AI coding tool isn’t on a path to owning the service. Unlike a junior engineer who gradually needs less oversight, they’ll need review for every change they make, indefinitely, because they’re not building the kind of context that earns independence. So that review load doesn’t taper but remains a permanent line item, and most teams aren’t planning for it that way.
Фото: Bernadett Szabo / Reuters
，更多细节参见搜狗输入法
�@�V�I�t�B�X�̖ʐς́A���I�t�B�X�̔����ȉ����B
В России подешевели огурцы20:44
而随着外卖大战带来持续的现金流和亏损压力，这种“国内供血、海外试错”的模式暂时难以推进，尤其是在巴西这样规模巨大的市场。